Comparing MetaMask and Trust Wallet for DeFi and crypto users

2025-09-22

Written by:Simpson Neil
Comparing MetaMask and Trust Wallet for DeFi and crypto users
⚠ Risk Disclaimer: All information provided on FinNews247, including market analysis, data, opinions and reviews, is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, legal or tax advice. The crypto and financial markets are highly volatile and you can lose some or all of your capital. Nothing on this site constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any asset, or to follow any particular strategy. Always conduct your own research and, where appropriate, consult a qualified professional before making investment decisions. FinNews247 and its contributors are not responsible for any losses or actions taken based on the information provided on this website.

MetaMask vs Trust Wallet: A Practical Guide for DeFi and Crypto Users

MetaMask and Trust Wallet are two of the most widely used non-custodial wallets for Web3. Both let you hold tokens, manage NFTs, and connect to decentralized applications (dApps). Yet they excel in different environments: MetaMask shines on desktop with tight browser integration for advanced DeFi workflows, while Trust Wallet prioritizes a mobile-first experience with broad multi-chain coverage and built-in staking.

Quick Verdict

  • Choose MetaMask if you mostly use a desktop browser, interact with many dApps on EVM chains, and want granular control over RPCs, gas, and hardware-wallet workflows.
  • Choose Trust Wallet if you prefer mobile-first convenience, need wide multi-chain coverage (incl. non-EVM networks), and want simple, in-app staking and NFT management.

Both are non-custodial: you control the private keys and must safeguard your recovery phrase.

Non-Custodial Basics

Non-custodial wallets keep keys on your device, not with a centralized intermediary. This gives full control and portability, but also full responsibility for backup and security. Neither wallet can recover funds if you lose your seed phrase.

Platform & UX

MetaMask

  • Browser-first (Chrome/Firefox/Brave/Edge) with a capable mobile app (iOS/Android).
  • Excellent for desktop DeFi: quick dApp connections, custom networks, and advanced gas controls.
  • Built-in Swap aggregator and streamlined signing flows for frequent on-chain actions.

Trust Wallet

  • Mobile-first experience with an in-app dApp browser and simple flows for sending, swapping, and staking.
  • Supports many chains out of the box; a good fit for users who hold assets beyond Ethereum’s EVM ecosystem.
  • A browser extension exists, but the overall design remains strongly optimized for mobile.

Chain Support

  • MetaMask: Native support for Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks (Polygon, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, etc.) via custom RPCs. Note: Non-EVM chains (e.g., Solana) are not natively supported.
  • Trust Wallet: Broad multi-chain support, including EVM and many non-EVM networks (e.g., BNB Smart Chain, Solana, and others), useful for users with diverse assets.

dApp Access & Swaps

  • MetaMask: Seamless desktop dApp connectivity through browser injection; strong compatibility across major DeFi protocols. Built-in swap aggregator for EVM assets.
  • Trust Wallet: In-app dApp browser on mobile makes discovering and using dApps straightforward. Built-in swap features for supported chains.

NFT Management

  • MetaMask: Smooth NFT handling on Ethereum and other EVM chains. Great with desktop marketplaces and mint sites.
  • Trust Wallet: Multi-chain NFT display and management from mobile, helpful if your collectibles live across several ecosystems.

Staking & Earning

  • MetaMask: Integrations for ETH staking (via partners) and broad EVM DeFi access for yield strategies through dApps.
  • Trust Wallet: Simple, in-app staking flows for selected assets (e.g., BNB or other supported networks), designed for ease of use on mobile.

Security, Recovery, and Hardware Wallets

  • Both are non-custodial and rely on a 12/24-word seed phrase. Enable biometric lock/PIN on mobile and store backups offline.
  • Hardware wallets: MetaMask on desktop works well with popular hardware devices for added key isolation. Trust Wallet’s compatibility is improving (not equally available across all platforms); check your device/OS combo.
  • Open source & audits: Review current repositories and security disclosures; only install from official stores and verify publisher signatures.

Fees & Costs

  • Neither wallet charges custody fees. You pay network gas to miners/validators.
  • Built-in swap features may include an explicit fee and/or aggregator spread—compare with external DEX quotes.

Privacy & Data

  • Both support read-only dApp connections until you approve a transaction or signature.
  • Limit approvals: periodically review and revoke token allowances on major networks.
  • Use different accounts for testing vs. high-value holdings; avoid doxxing addresses across social profiles.

Feature Comparison

Category MetaMask Trust Wallet
Primary Platform Browser-first + mobile Mobile-first (extension available)
Chain Coverage EVM networks via custom RPC Broad multi-chain incl. non-EVM
dApp Access Excellent desktop injection In-app mobile dApp browser
NFT Handling Strong on EVM NFTs Good multi-chain NFTs
Staking ETH staking via partners; DeFi via dApps Native in-app staking for selected assets
Hardware Wallets Well-supported on desktop Improving; check device/OS
Best For DeFi power users on desktop Mobile-first, multi-chain users

Use Cases & Workflows

DeFi Power User (Desktop)

  • MetaMask + hardware wallet for approvals and vault interactions on EVM L2s.
  • Custom RPCs, gas tuning, and batch interactions with advanced dApps.

Mobile Investor (Multi-Chain Portfolio)

  • Trust Wallet to hold assets across EVM and non-EVM chains; simple in-app staking where supported.
  • Use the dApp browser for quick swaps and NFT minting on the go.

Pros & Cons

MetaMask

  • Pros: Exceptional desktop dApp experience; granular control; strong hardware-wallet support.
  • Cons: EVM-centric; non-EVM users will need separate wallets; learning curve for beginners.

Trust Wallet

  • Pros: Mobile simplicity; broad chain coverage; convenient in-app staking and NFT views.
  • Cons: Desktop workflows are less central; hardware-wallet pairings vary by platform; fewer granular controls.

Security Tips

  • Back up the seed phrase offline; never share screenshots of it.
  • Enable device PIN/biometrics and wallet password lock.
  • Prefer hardware wallets for large balances; test small transactions first.
  • Regularly review token approvals; use reputable revoking tools.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which wallet is better for DeFi? For desktop-heavy EVM DeFi, MetaMask is hard to beat. For mobile-first users who hold assets across multiple ecosystems, Trust Wallet offers a simpler experience.

Can either wallet hold NFTs? Yes. MetaMask handles EVM NFTs well; Trust Wallet offers broader multi-chain NFT display.

Do they charge fees? Both are free to use; you pay network gas. Built-in swaps may include a fee/spread.

Are they custodial? No. Both are non-custodial—you control the keys.

Do they work with hardware wallets? MetaMask on desktop integrates well; Trust Wallet support depends on platform—verify for your device.

Conclusion

MetaMask and Trust Wallet are excellent—but for different contexts. MetaMask is the power tool for desktop DeFi on EVM chains; Trust Wallet is the mobile all-rounder with wide chain support and easy staking. Pick based on your primary device, target chains, and how much control you want over advanced settings.

Further Reading and Resources

Guides | Market | Crypto Exchanges

More from Guides & Reviews

View all
Why Splitting Your Capital Matters More Than Catching the Perfect Bottom
Why Splitting Your Capital Matters More Than Catching the Perfect Bottom

Trying to guess the exact bottom in a downtrend is a game of ego. Splitting your capital into several tranches, and accumulating step by step, is a game of probabilities and discipline. This article explains why the investors who survive and thrive i

Uptrend & Downtrend: How to Recognise Market Direction and Respond Safely
Uptrend & Downtrend: How to Recognise Market Direction and Respond Safely

Uptrends and downtrends shape every chart, from digital assets to traditional markets. This guide explains how to recognise them using price structure, trendlines and moving averages—and how traders use that information to manage risk and plan entrie

Support and Resistance Basics: How to Read, Draw and Use Key Levels Safely
Support and Resistance Basics: How to Read, Draw and Use Key Levels Safely

Support and resistance levels are the backbone of chart-based analysis. This guide explains what they are, how to draw them realistically, and how traders use them to plan entries, exits and risk—not as magic lines, but as practical reference areas i

Dow Theory Basics: The Classic Foundation of Technical Analysis
Dow Theory Basics: The Classic Foundation of Technical Analysis

Long before modern indicators like RSI, MACD or Bollinger Bands, Dow Theory laid the groundwork for how technicians think about trends, phases and market psychology. This guide explains the core principles of Dow Theory and shows how they still help

Moving Averages in Technical Analysis: What They Are and How to Use Them Safely
Moving Averages in Technical Analysis: What They Are and How to Use Them Safely

Moving averages are one of the first tools most traders encounter in technical analysis. This guide explains what moving averages are, the difference between simple and exponential versions, how to choose timeframes, and how to use them to read trend

MACD Indicator Explained: Settings, Signals and Practical Use in Technical Analysis
MACD Indicator Explained: Settings, Signals and Practical Use in Technical Analysis

MACD is one of the most popular momentum indicators in technical analysis. This guide explains how the Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator is built, what its standard settings mean, how to read crossovers, zero-line shifts and divergences